Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jason A's avatar

The defense is bad but not irredeemable. I think now is the time to fit the scheme more to different lineups, if I were Thibs. Going switch-everything with Sims plays to his strengths and forces everyone to be more engaged defenders and forces that inertia (re: Randle) Benjy speaks about so much. Then when he's off, you could go to drop more with IHart. (That's not to say it's a perfect solution, but how much worse can we be/what do we have to lose if we have been the worst defense in the A for this stetch.) I think lineup changes should be considered after the fact. There's a lot of tinkering that can be done before switching lineups again.

Right now, the team feels like a quasi Snyder-Jazz team when they could funnel everything to Gobert and now that our center is gone, defenders are playing in the same system but there's no last line of defense.. But I think there's more the team can do defensively.

Expand full comment
Andrew Horne's avatar

Sims has been a nice story for one or two games but we need an upgrade due to Mitch's extended absence.

Realistic, potential trades that would add something new but wouldn't deplete the asset base too much -

a) Fournier and one of this year's FRP's or the Detroit 2nd for PJ Washington (Kentucky guy). Concept is to acquire small ball 5 who spaces the floor better than Sims with some 3 pt shooting capability (career 36% 3 pt shooter). Let's us play switching scheme on D. He had 79 blocks last year - so a version of Obi that can protect the rim to some extent as insurance for Randle going down as backup 4.

b) Fournier, Deuce and one of this year's FRP's or the Detroit 2nd for Olynyk and Horton-Tucker.

Olynyk isn't really a rim protector but is a career 37% 3 pt shooter. I think he would really help us vs Boston & Milwaukee by forcing Lopez and KP to guard the 3 pt line. Both Olynyk and THT are expiring so if it doesn't work it didn't cost too much.

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts