Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ken's avatar

Excellent article. What I will say is that everyone tries to learn from the last champ (and they should) but it also seems that every year there are somewhat different strokes for different folks. So I don’t think we have to become the thunder or the pacers to beat the thunder or the pacers. But it is also apparent that we need to fill holes to get to the next level. Two bad defenders in the top five is an issue. No secondary creator is another and tied directly to the overall poor passing. And bench is another.

For years we have tried and mostly succeeded at masking these deficiencies by limiting turnovers and getting offensive rebounds so that we could out shot attempt our way to victory. It worked in Cleveland a few years ago. It did not work against Pacers this year (though we did not stick well to the cut down turn over side of things). Anyway, I see a roster that is currently ill equipped to patch the holes we all know exist.

Expand full comment
Dbn123's avatar
2dEdited

Jonathan, your latest newsletter was excellent as always. I'm consistently impressed by how you manage to write such insightful, Knicks-focused columns, even on mornings when it seems there's little new to discuss about the team.

You perfectly articulated my concerns about the Knicks' path to the finals. Your points on league trends particularly highlighted areas where the Knicks must improve to contend. In no particular order, my main takeaways were:

* **Depth:** The team currently lacks depth, going only seven deep. When considering Robinson's health issues and the fact that both OG and Towns typically miss 15-20 games per season (with this past season being an anomaly), because of the potential for injuries, the actual depth is even less than seven.

* **Passing:** It's surprising how the Knicks' passing and ball movement seem to diminish in the crucial final minutes of games. OG, Bridges, Brunson, Deuce, and Robinson are all average passers, with Towns and perhaps Hart being only slightly better.

* **League-wide strength on at least one side of the ball:** You mentioned that a championship team needs to be top 10 on either offense or defense. As currently constructed, the Knicks are likely top 15 in both. To break into the top 10, they'll need new acquisitions or a coach who can truly elevate the offense (I'm hopeful about the latter).

To genuinely contend for a title and reach the finals, the Knicks need at least two more high-quality, seasoned rotation players. They also need to acquire a starter who can significantly improve the team's passing and hire a coach who can maximize the offense, as this team will likely remain a middling defensive unit as is.

The front office certainly has a lot on their plate, and not an abundance of assets. However, like many of us, I'm sure they see the Eastern Conference as wide open as it's ever been. With the Knicks already positioned in the top three or four if they stay healthy, the right moves could definitely propel them to the finals.

Expand full comment
33 more comments...

No posts