Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Varlow's avatar

I remember when John Starks and Anthony Mason became major parts of the Knicks and they were the two stories I was most excited about in part because of the journey's they taken to get there and how no one even knew who they were having not been draft picks or free agents. Starks started out as a hustle and defense guy with hops and Mason was the same except with physicality instead of leaping ability. They played their way to bigger roles on a team that had established team defense and winning with effort on both ends, crashing the boards, bruising. All this is to say that I think our current team has some of the same concepts and while we now have amazing people like Macri to tell us all about something like summer league or g-league where back in the 90's there wasn't any of this scrutiny even available to the regular person, I think what Jon wrote here about Peterson understanding that summer league is about being 'star in the role' applies to all of these guys and includes rookies how are not blessed with star ability from the jump. Pretty much everyone on our team with the exception of Brunson and Randle are trying to be stars in a role and that role has to include defense, hustle and rebounding. If it doesn't, they have no role on the Knicks. That's why Obi didn't fit and hopefully that's something the rest of the guys all get and are excited about. Now, if everyone on our team is working to improve what they do, improve conditioning, add wrinkles to their games and generally get with the whole team concept....I'm just saying as Julius did in his interview with PG, something to the effect of 'we're not that far off'. We are a young team that can grow together and we just made the 2nd round of the playoffs. That's a big deal and should add up to continued success under the right coach and the right organization.

Expand full comment
Mike D.'s avatar

I agree that the entire Obi situation was an organizational failure, and I also agree that at the moment, it’s not worth freaking out about. I do, however, think it’ll look a lot worse if he thrives in Indy (or could look a lot better if he gets displaced by a rookie).

On one hand, he was very inconsistent and showed glaring weaknesses in his backup role, thus supporting the argument that he didn’t deserve a bigger one.

On the other hand, when he has gotten opportunity in Randle’s absences, he’s thrived. Fifteen career games as a starter: 20.8 / 5.7 / 3.1 on 69.7 TS% in just under 34 minutes per while never being a ball-stopper / letting the offense flow. If he does this in Indy, the failure might be worth the yelling.

On the other other hand (which I guess is a foot), that’s a tiny sample size, and most of that tiny sample size were meaningless games. If Indy’s not a playoff team, or even sniffing around the play-in (no guarantee), any numbers he puts up could be empty calories.

All of this is to say, it may not be worth crying about now, but it’s also way too early to judge the severity of the mistake (or the compounding of mistakes) overall.

(Yes, this was a response to a footnote 😂)

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts