Discussion about this post

User's avatar
AHT's avatar

The obvious question here is why Thibs plays the starters so many minutes when the real question has to be what are the alternatives. In close games I understand the logic because the starters give us the best chance to win. I still think Thibs needs to work in a few bench guys during those games in order to prepare them for a larger role down the stretch. Steve Kerr said this last season about his bench and it absolutely makes sense because you can’t expect a guy to come in and contribute if they’ve never been in a meaningful game. Huk has experience from his time in the Euro league and Kolek seems ready for a larger chunk of minutes too. Obviously we are not going to win every game, so some games have to-be conceded earlier in order to get our starters rest and our bench some reps. Just a thought.

Expand full comment
Dbn123's avatar

You reap what you sow.

Thibs cannot keep playing the starters such heavy minutes without expecting the law of diminishing returns to take effect. Even if you need to sacrifice some early season wins, breaking in Kolek at the very least will prove long-term benefit.

And for the life of me, I will never understand games where the Knicks are up 15-20 points in the last couple of minutes and yet Thibs is still playing the starters.

Finally, the front office must have known dealing all those picks for Bridges and losing iHart, and two-for one in the Towns deal would leave the bench thin with very little in the way of assets to import a strong bench.

Expand full comment
31 more comments...

No posts